Gift city Ahmadabad which can be published in the same newspaper that had carried the controversial article. Taking note of his statement, the bench asked the Gujarat government counsel and Saxena's advocate Gaurav Goyal to take instructions and posted the matter for hearing next week. Nandy had earlier contended that the FIR was registered out of malaise intention and aimed at penalising him for expressing his bonfire views. Gujarat government had been seeking the nod of the apex court to continue with the investigation to a conclusive end into the FIR against him under section 153A promoting communal disharmony and 153B imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration of the IPC.
|