There is a never-ending debate about the changes that our society has to undergo. However, we tend to forget there are several types of change. Therefore, we can choose between incremental change vs radical change.
Incremental change vs radical change: what is the difference?
Let us start by explaining the characteristic features of these two kinds of change.
Incremental change is gradual, slow, and steady. It aims to solve problems related to the functionality of the government by “greasing the machine”. Therefore, it is usually a more stable approach.
On the other hand, radical change can completely turn things around. It is a rapid innovation that calls to leave behind the preexisting system and create a new one to better suit the obstacles presented.
Which one to use: incremental vs radical change
When it comes to deciding between incremental change vs radical change, various things should be taken into account. Governments must analyze the conditions and urgency of the problem they face and have an open-minded and innovative approach to solving it. Gradual change is more effective when dealing with issues that do not require sporadic change: e.g., incremental changes are the only option in cases where there is a divided government. Radical change has proven effective when dealing with critical issues such as climate change. However, it can further worsen the situation if there is a decline in trust in the government.
|