Like lots of people in america, I've work. To get fresh information, please consider checking out: visit our site. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and my taxes are distributed by the government because they see fit. If you are interested in religion, you will seemingly choose to read about User:MarylynCollette - #Refugee wiki. To be able to get that paycheck, I am necessary to go a urine test, which I have not a problem with. I have nothing to hide and the key reason I've no issue with a drug test is. What I do have a problem with may be the distribution of my taxes to people who are doing drugs and never have to go a urine test.
Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to acquire a welfare check, because I have to pass one to make it for them?
Please comprehend, I have not a problem with helping people return on their feet. For another way of interpreting this, please consider peeping at: Drug Rehabilitation - No easy choices\uff20best_cash\uff5cPChome \u500b\u4eba\u65b0\u805e\u53f0. I do, on the other hand, have trouble with helping somebody sit on their bottom. Can you imagine the amount of money the state could save if people had to go a urine test to obtain a public assistance check?
A 1999 Michigan law required a pilot program of random substance abuse testing in at the very least three areas. Medicine assessment started in the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a given part of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.
All the new people for that region had to provide a urine sample to officers or give up their right to any government assistance. Furthermore, any candidates already within the program had to submit to random testing.
A class action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days ahead of schedule testing. The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Two Michigan parents and a Detroit business (The Westside Mothers) were called in the match. The organization focuses on representing numerous welfare recipients and their families. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan says, \The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country might be put through a search by the us government unless there is reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients may be bad, but that's not a not yet, anyway.\
I've talked to a number of people face-to-face and on forums about their thoughts and the ones that oppose this have the exact same stance, that it's unconstitutional. For a second viewpoint, we know you check out: \uc218\uc5c5\uc81c\uc548\uc11c\uc2e0\uccad - Drug Rehab Treatment Healing A Few Ideas 44714. For me, it appears that I'm perhaps not moving random drug test onto any random resident. The welfare recipient decides to get help from the federal government. So much like distributing paperwork, you need to send a urine test. Yet another position people discuss is false positives. Then do a hair follicle test, well if they maintain fake positive.
If urine check are unconstitutional, then discard the entire welfare program. Let your voice be heard on Political Majority.com..
|